SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ask Vendit Off-Topic Questions

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Walkingshadow who wrote (6037)3/6/2005 10:27:10 AM
From: Jill  Read Replies (2) of 8752
 
Well I do disagree. It is my profession after all and I know how careful one has to be sometimes. I once did a piece where the magazine I was working on, was threatened with a potential lawsuit ahead of time if I went ahead and wrote the piece. We convened a meeting and agreed, even if we were in the right, the magazine might have to pay minimum $20K to defend a baseless lawsuit. The only reason the lawsuit was being threatened was that two people didn't want us to run a piece that went against their agenda and opinion. We fact checked every word, even if and or but :). We ran the piece. Everything went okay.

Newspapers and magazines are generally run by corporations, and in some cases are like institutions (NY Times). You can do a housecleaning if something goes wrong (as did at the NY Times). Anybody can post a blog, so some checks and balances have to be instituted. So I for one hope the judge creates some of those.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext