SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Suma who wrote (15810)3/6/2005 3:03:52 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Read Replies (2) of 20773
 
The prosecution in the OJ case did some funny mistakes, some of
which anyone slightly skilled in chemistry maybe has
unwillingly (or willingly) done as students.

The explosive-underwear thing is a classic one, not just for
chemists, but also for those who know how gunpowder was originally produced.
That is, regular pee and explosives (plus fertilizers) can
be tested positively for by the same testing procedure.

However, the OJ-case was neither about explosives nor traces
of gunpowder, nor underwear, but it was appr the same time
that FBI chemist used the FBI system to analyze his underwear
and they came back as "full of traces of explosives".

The OJ-prosecution team mostly focused on preservatives
used to preserve blood and what eating a couple of tomatos
might result in.

They must have been either desperate or unwillingly unskilled.

PS Non Compos Mentis is sometimes pretty good, at least they
use a lot of raw energy, with a regular danish sense of humor

.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News