THE GIULIANA DEBATE
I can see the headline on websites like Little Green Footballs:
"Schechter Defends Women."
Yesterday my efforts to synthesize and add context to the breaking Giuliana Sgrena story were well received by many readers, but drew an immediate and slashing attack from the venom-spewing part of the Blogosphere. The slime squad at Little Green Footballs went after me with a vengeance.
The Headline:
"Schechter Defends Sgrena, Accuses US of War Crimes"
Duh?
And there I was, described this way:
"Danny Schechter, a vituperative far-left wacko"
I was attacked for showing "solidarity with the communist anti-war Italian left: Was Giuliana Sgrena Targeted?"
Actually my blog is titled differently. Quite differently I asked: "Why Was Giuliana Targeted -- Or Was She?" The words "Or was she" conveniently buried in the smear. The article nominally about me then slides into an attack on Democratic Underground of which I am not a member. No matter.
The little green ones note: "But it isn't discrediting Sgrena to mention her radical anti-war background; it's a simple statement of fact, obvious to anyone who reads her work. She's employed by a newspaper called Il Manifesto. It's openly communist, and has published many many articles expressing sympathy and admiration for the Iraqi mujahideen, and loathing for the US."
Well actually, wouldn't you know, communists are not big Mujahideen backers -- remember the Afghan war against the USSR -- in the same way that Saddam was not Osama's homey. In fact I posted a piece quoting what Giuliana had actually written. They didn't bother to read it.
I then tried to respond on their site but the technology doesn't allow it. Look at this blog and you will find a whole swarm of rightists posting all over the place. My favorite: an attempt to weave a conspiracy theory involving a rightwing Italian government, a "communist" newspaper and anti-communists. Let's see how President Bush spins today when he gives his annual State of the Terror address at the National Defense University.
Does anyone know if that prestigious university has a cheerleading squad?
Trick question: It's called the media.
SHOULD YOU BOTHER TO RESPOND TO WACK ATTACKS?
Here's what I wanted to post on the LGF site. Maybe its just as well that their software does not allow a wack job like me access:
Responding to this harsh denunciation is probably masochistic at best, suicidal at worse. I have written extensively on the issues of media coverage in Iraq. My blog entry is titled: Why Was Giuliana Targeted -- Or Was She? You leave out the "Or Was She?" Why?
I reported on this incident from many different points of view, citing many sources, and raising questions. In your politically polluted world, that makes me a "wacko." So be it. Then what are you as you play football with people's reputations and spew name calling?
I wasn't in Iraq when this happened. Were You? The Washington Post reports today there have been many incidents like this. In my film WMD and book Embedded, I call for an independent investigation and ask WERE JOURNALISTS TARGETED? Has any network investigated? This is not a left-wing-right wing thing.
An intelligence agent with an allied government was killed. A journalist was wounded. Why blame the victim for the crime. Does that bother you at all?
Any time you want to have a mutually respectful debate, lets do it.
Giuliana reported on prohibited weapons being used in Fallujah. Did you?
An official of the (our?) Iraq Health Ministry made the same claim Friday I know it is uncomfortable to let facts get in the way of an idealogical tirade but why don't you try it?
This just in: "According to the Italian Foreign Minister, quoted this morning in the Scotsman, the car carrying Giuliana Sgrena was not speeding, and was not ordered to stop, making Italy's opinion on the incident officially different from the American one. “The car was travelling at a velocity that couldn’t have been more than 40 kilometre (25 miles) per hour..."
watchingthewatchers.org
FORGET EASON
Dan Kennedy of the Phoenix, a more centrist and well informed media writer I admire was also critical
"Danny Schechter has rounded up every bit of reportage and commentary he can find on the bizarre shooting of Italian journalist Giuliana Srgena by US troops and the killing of the Italian intelligence officer who'd rescued her.
"I wish Schechter wouldn't hang so much on Eason Jordan, a spineless little man who lacks the courage of his own convictions - that is, if we can even figure out what his convictions are. (According to Schechter, Jordan's current silence is bought and paid for. Very nice.)
"But this is a weird and disturbing story, and it bears watching."
www.bostonphoenix.com |
