SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy who wrote (223110)3/9/2005 5:36:21 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (2) of 1572160
 
I still don't understand you. You made a point (I believe) that there was NOTHING Saddam could have done to prevent Iraq war 2. I think there were plenty of things he could have done to prevent Iraq War 2, and the most obvious (and first that came to my mind) was resign. He could have accepted political asylum in a friendly country, same as Liberia's Charles Taylor is doing in Nigeria today. Ba da bing - no Iraq war 2!

My point was that, short of total capitulation by saddam, bush was going to war. Frankly i don't even see how saddam could have left power and avoided war for his country anyway, since the power vacuum alone would have meant a civil conflict we'd have to go quell...so right back to where we are today. But the main issue is that I dont' subscribe to this notion that we can go around the world demanding that leaders we don't like step down. And we surely have a responsibility to check facts and conduct due diligence before we take arms against another nation. And certainly have also a responsibility to do it with the backing of some world order, of which the UN is the current embodiment....or else you have wild west diplomacy in which the strong rule.

Al
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext