SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SilentZ who wrote (223457)3/11/2005 12:00:21 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1573812
 
John has NEVER implied that we shouldn't go after the people who attacked us on 9/11.

You continue to confuse Iraq with Al-Qaida.


It is you who is confused. You have Al Qaeda confused with the more generic term "terrorist threat". As Bush made clear early on, this is not a war against Al Qaeda, nor should it be. It is a war against terrorism and those who support terrorism. This is a proper framing of the issue.

By moving Iraq toward democracy (and as a result, other states in the region, as well as the disarming of Libya) we reduce the threat of terrorism. Bush and his advisers had the forsight to realize this would happen as a result of removing Saddam, they appear to be right, and you ought to be giving them credit for making YOUR WORLD a safer place.

Had we merely defeated Al Qaeda, we would still have other terrorist threats and brainwashed Arab children to contend with. The Administration recognize this and acted to remove the problem at its roots. Clearly, this appears to be working well beyond anyone's expectations at this point.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext