SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 45.51+10.7%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Phud who wrote (180407)3/16/2005 4:42:32 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Elmer, after some thinking, the problem with put selling for me is this:

I would have to leave money on the side (cash-on-the-side) to buy shares if the stock dropped. But I'd rather have that money in the market, than in the bank waiting for a stock to drop. Put selling (assumed you meant strike < market) is more bearish than just writing OTM covered calls. So I am probably more bullish than you in style.

But if the stock drops, I can collect premiums on the way down as I buy the CCs back and rewrite at a lower strike price.

In some ways, selling a put (assuming you meant strike < market) is like a deep-in-the-money call, (not in the implementation but in the bottom-line $), and I only do DITM CCs on AMD, not Intc, and deep because with AMD I don't care if the stock gets called away - it's not an underlying stock I'd want to hold. But with Intc I actually want to hold the shares for growth, not leave all the money in the bank.

I think selling puts is a good idea if you're more conservative (which I'm not) because it's a strategy that requires cash-on-the-side, not in the market - cash that is not put to work.

Regards,
Amy J
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext