Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (159227)	3/17/2005 10:12:08 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Hi mike. Yes I'm well aware of the "well regulated" clause. Have you ever heard of an "unarmed" militia? The problem with the 2'nd Amendment crowd is specifically that they don't think weapons should be restricted to militia. They focus on the freedom to keep weapons, not the "well regulated" militia part. Suppose Bush were to propose that all weapons in private ownership needed to be registered with state militia, and that all gun owners likewise needed to join the state militia and be subject to the duties and regulations of said organization. What do you think the NRA's comments on that little proposal would be?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next