SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (224686)3/17/2005 4:49:44 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1571734
 
Maybe "in some ways" as you put it but SS is not a Ponzi scheme. How come you all can call something you don't like "a name other than what it is" but JF and I can't?

Ted please try to actually read something before responding to it. I have never had any problem with anyone, including you and JF, calling SS a pniz scheme.

Once again from John's post -
" When are you going to explain the Bush record deficits, the record trade imbalance? How conservative is that? How is that not "Ponzi"? "

Note that he is not talking about social security.

Once again I ask why do you apparently thing "the Bush record deficits" and "the record trade imbalance" are the same as "social security". Your series of posts only makes sense if they really are all the same thing.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext