Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (104896)	3/19/2005 9:23:01 AM
From: aladin	Read Replies (1) of 793917

Bill, The big push on this case is a religious one. Especially from the Catholic church, which doesn't want this to be possible. Absolutely wrong. The Catholic church teaches that unnecessary medical care and prolonging suffering are also wrong. So prolonging the life of a terminal patient against their will would be wrong. As would taking the life of disabled person, or an unborn child. The presumption is life. The videos, which are recent, hilight the complexity of this case. While the left evokes the issue of state interference in a family decision - they ignore the parents who have been fighting a husband with a financial interest in seeing his wife pass away. This is not mentioned much in the MSM. As CB has pointed out - you should make very sure your wishes on these issues are spelled out in a living will. Terri did not have that - and her husband and parents disagree on her disposition. I would be inclined to believe the Husband if he had no financial interest, a live in girlfriend and children by her. Oh - that is mentioned much either. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next