"I just keep saying, we all have to consider the source(s) and look beyond our bias."
You "say" that, but what you really mean is your biased
sources are somehow superior (they say what you want to
hear), therefore they are more credible than my biased
sources.
However, what actually happens between us is that I provide
you with factually accurate information that discredits the
disinformation your sources present as fact. And my sources
are consistently credible & independently verifiable. Your
sources have serious problems with facts & reality (IE
Michael Moore, Al Franken, The Nation, MoveOn.org,
Truthout.org, commondreams.com, opensecrets.org, The Daily
Misleader, NPR, Molly Ivins, Imus, Friedman, BBC News, the
lndependent/UK, NYT, LA Times, CBS, ET AL).
You seem to miss that critical aspect all the time Suma. Why
is that? |
