"You have done well to name a great many of my sources so why not provide us with yours."
I'm all for it.
"Then, let the people who post here make some comparisons so that I don't stand alone."
ROTFLMAO! I see. If it's just you & me honestly discussing
things in a fair & equitable manner, it somehow it's
inequitable, unjust, unfair & unbalanced. However, if it's me
against you & everyone else here, now that's fair & balanced.
:-)
OK, I'll tell you what. I'll list sources I use in my
research & other sources (blogs, media, etc.) I rely on for
consistently credible & accurate reporting.
Anyone who wishes can cite genuine instances where my sources
have lied, distorted, misrepresented facts &/or intentionally
deceived. For them to be considered genuine, you must be able
to link me directly to my source actually telling the lie,
distortion, etc. And you must also provide links to credible,
verifiable evidence that what my source said was indeed a
lie, etc.
I will not accept personal opinions or recollections as
genuine examples. I will not accept links to other people who
express their opinions or recollections as fact either. Only
real facts replete with links to verifiable evidence from
credible sources will be accepted as genuine.
I in turn, will furnish genuine examples of lies,
distortions, misrepresented facts &/or intentional deceptions
from your favorite sources in the same manner described above.
I will ignore any responses from folks who indulge in name
calling, personal attacks or other types of uncivil behavior
at me, my sources or the subjects being discussed. If this
cannot be done in a civil, reality based manner I am not
interested in pursuing this any further on this thread.
If all of the above is acceptable, then bring it on. |
