SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (105381)3/22/2005 1:41:35 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) of 793758
 
Those are some of the questions I have also MD...I really knew not much about the specifics of the case, but have been reading both sides....

I don't feel at all good about Michael's intentions. Since Terri and he won the insurance money, about 2 years into her situation...he has refused everything for her...meds, therapy, walking, whatever.

Has there been any accounting of what he did with his share and also Terri's share of the nearly $2,000,000? Probably not. He is her 'guardian.'

He could have taken his portion of the $400,000, paid whatever bills he had at that point, and gotten a divorce. The $1.3 million that Terri received, could have paid whatever bills she had, and the rest gone to her care at the nursing home.
When those funds were depleted, she would have gone onto Medicaid. However, $1 million should have lasted about 20 years (at approx $50,000/year), assuming there were no huge medical bills. Doesn't appear that he allowed much, if any, medical treatment....

If he truly loved her, he wouldn't have been living with another woman, who is now a commonlaw wife, and had a couple of children with her.... He wanted and needed to get on with his life. He did.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext