Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (105437)	3/22/2005 5:13:03 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) of 793743

don't understand what you think that demonstrates what it demonstrates is if he was the person responsible for having the tube inserted in the first place (while she was still able to swallow ....at least according to some testimony) he then created the very scenario for the argument he was to use in court to have her life terminated ....that being she is vegetating on a feeding tube and had her express (hearsay) wish to him was that she would prefer to die than to live in that way don't see the point of that. So what if she can swallow? How does that change anything? Her higher level brain is still mush. What's the difference between being a cerebrumless and swallowing vs cerebrumless and non-swallowing? The idea is that she purportedly wouldn't want to live without a cerebrum. The swallowing thing seems like a red herring to me but I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise. that has been in contention according to what i have read at the very least this woman should have the benefit of the latest testing techniques (for example no MRI or pet scan) so that a consensus view can be established wrt her current condition... and even with such testing, i think the court should revist mr. schiavo's standing as her guardian considering HIS current situation with a common law wife and children

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next