SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neeka who wrote (106148)3/27/2005 8:01:06 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 793678
 
But you bring up something that elicits a comparison. Roe v Wade. Wasn't that a bit of "ad-hocery?" If not, how does it differ?

There was no intent to single out Jane Roe for extra-legal treatment. On the contrary, it was intended that any decision for Roe would apply to everyone in her class, that of pregnant women.

In Terri's case, if there has been any thought given even for what her class might be it has eluded my inquiries. Let alone for the social and budgetary consequences of changing the rules for her entire class. The crusade has been all about one woman and nothing about her cohort.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News