SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF
COMS 0.001600.0%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scrapps who wrote (4976)9/4/1997 4:58:00 PM
From: Moonray   of 22053
 
The Townshend Battle of the Modems War continues:

September 04, 1997 4:03 PM
DOW JONES NEWS SERVICE

ROCKWELL INTL SKEPTICAL ABOUT 3COM MODEM TECH LICENSING

PALO ALTO, Calif. (Dow Jones)--Rockwell
International Corp. (ROK) took a skeptical
approach to Wednesday's patent licensing
proposal from 3Com Corp. (COMS),
questioning whether technology from Brent
Townshend was key to Rockwell's 56Kflex
fast modem technology.

In a prepared statement from the Seal Beach,
Calif., electronics maker, Rockwell said, "we
do not believe that Townshend's patents, if
and when issued, will be fundamental to
K56flex and where the (International
Telecommunications Union) standard is
heading."

The company's position may make arriving at
a standard for this new high-speed modem
more difficult. Both Rockwell and 3Com have
competing designs for the 56K modem, which
operates about twice as fast as the previous
generation of 33.6 kilobits per second
modems, and the differing designs don't
communicate.

A standard backed by the union would bridge
that communications gap.

A Rockwell spokesperson wasn't available for
additional comment.

On Wednesday, 3Com, acting as exclusive
licensee of Stanford University consulting
professor Townshend's technology, offered
terms for licensing the technology to makers of
modem semiconductors. The company
proposed licensing terms of $1.25 a modem
and $9 per modem port, explaining that it
hoped the proposal would further efforts to
reach a standard.

But Thursday Rockwell challenged the need
for such a license.

"We are greatly surprised, that given 3Com's
belief in the importance of Townshend's
technology, they chose to keep it quiet during
the nearly year-long standards process," the
company's statement said. "We call upon
3Com to publicly reveal what components of
the contributions are based on Townshend
technology."

o~~~ O
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext