SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (106392)3/28/2005 2:46:46 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 793757
 
I'd like to see a provision in the law that a person with a conflict of interest can't make life or death decisions for an incapacitated person, or at least that there is a way to remove them from that status in the event that a conflict of interest becomes patent.

I don't see how that could be made to work. The spouse always has an interest in whether his or her partner dies. Often do the adult children, as well. If there is a conflict of interest, you are not likely to know of it in a timely way. You can't possibly hire a PI and accountant and launch an investigation of the parties sufficiently timely for most life and death decisions, not to mention the cost of that. And, if the conflict becomes patent, it would be after the decision, which, in the case of a choice for death, would be too late.

I think you'd be trading in one set of problems for another, and a less manageable set, to boot. The spouse is in the best position to know. I think you have to trust the spouse and adult children as the default unless some conflict just screams at you.

In a case that drags on like the Schiavo case did, the judge might want leave room to assign a neutral guardian once questions were raised. I don't see how you could go further.

Add to the morals of this story: marry with care or sign an advance directive.

I think this is a watershed event in our history

I agree.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext