SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (107026)3/31/2005 10:37:21 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 793800
 
What happened that changed his mind between November 1992 and March 1993 when he wrote a Do Not Resuscitate order? Just a coincidence the malpractice suit was settled in January 1993?

I think one has to really bend over backwards to maintain a benign view of Michael S.

PS - there wasn't a plug to pull in 1992. Or in March 1993 when he wrote a DNR order. Or in August 1993 when he told a doctor not to give her an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection (which would have been life threatening if not treated - the antibiotics were given anyway).

She may not have ever needed the feeding tube.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News