SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill4/2/2005 10:05:11 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 793914
 
Terrorism v. Gay Marriage
PolySigh - The political science take on things.
polysigh.blogspot.com

I ran a model of the Bush-Kerry vote controlling for party identification, ideology, sex, age, race, income, and education. I also controlled for whether someone thought invading Iraq was worth it and whether they approved of gay marriage. Both the Iraq and gay marriage variables were statistically significant, but the Iraq variable had much more impact on vote choice.

The probablity of a Bush vote was 87 percent among those who approved of the invasion, but only 31 percent among those who did not, a difference of 56 points. In contrast, the probability of a Bush vote among those approving of gay marriage was 42 percent versus 67 percent among those opposed, a difference of only 25 points. In other words, attitudes about Iraq and more than twice impact on the vote than did opinions about gay marriage. I then re-ran the model controlling for 2000 vote. With this variable included, the variable for gay marriage was no longer significant, suggesting that the gay marriage issue did nothing to change votes from 2000 to 2004.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext