SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (227611)4/4/2005 12:35:07 AM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (2) of 1578341
 
Re: ""Talk of "restricting" courts, may simply mean appropriate checks and balances being employed. EOM"

No, the judiciary is part of the checks and balances."

Pardon me, but "no" is an incorrect response. All three branches are part of checks and balances. My statement stands and as I wrote it, the proper short reply must be "yes."

Re: "Restricting the courts would be undemocratic."

No, the Courts ARE restricted by checks and balances, as are the legislative and the executive branches.

Re: "Our FF knew what they were doing."

Yes. And they expected the three branches to attempt to restrict each other as time passes, as deemed fit.

Dan B.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News