COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00160

0.0%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daniel G. DeBusschere who wrote (4985)	9/4/1997 9:56:00 PM
From: jhild	of 22053

Daniel, nothing personal, but that just doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to me. Biased or not what are their choices? Not do a 56kb standard? Do one without x2? These just don't seem like useful options. These would just be petulent responses from a body that would only be diminishing itself. I don't think ROK has opened up their intellectual property to the public domain as witnessed by their rattling their lawyers at USRX after they finished settling with MOT. The Townshend patents give COMS leverage back against ROK, now that COMS has paid and ROK hasn't. Besides ROK could easily spend more than 100K even if they could successfully defend themselves from it. These patents just don't seem to me to be a significant barrier, French xenophobia notwithstanding.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next