re: several items
1. fell flat: NAFF's web stats are actually above FBN and Webnode unique visitors and page view records for this period at post-4/1. And that's despite the outage SI/IHub had on Fri.
2. Your representation of my position ("You and your crew can be on record that there is no such thing as a crooked short, no problem with naked shorting and that there will never be a conviction of a short guru.") is of course a position I've never represented. And you wonder (as you did earlier today on another thread) why people don't take you seriously. Well, you don't address real points when people raise them -- you instead resort to this "fake position" thing as a smoke screen. Exactly as "NSS" know-nothings resort to "NSS" as a smoke screen.
Heh, maybe you should get Byrne to write your posts for you. He at least has a better "pretend" vocabularic understanding that would make you look better if you give him your SI password. Just tell him to leave out the Dana Carvey "Tools of Satan" diatribe, which would of course make both of you look stupid, instead of just you ... errr... I mean, him ... no wait ... I mean both of you. Wait ... which of you is taking that seriously? Uhh, geez, he said it, you quoted it, now I'm confused... is it both of youse stupid or just the one, or which one, or do you both agree, or not, or well, whatever. I'll just let you and Patrick and Patch and Aunt Jenny work it out. Permit me to suggest a "rock-scissors-paper" contest should your further inquiries towards that matter remain unresolved with the chicken bone thing. |
