SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: croesus1111 who wrote (41652)4/10/2005 11:52:30 PM
From: whitepine  Read Replies (2) of 206325
 
Explicit collusion was a fact from 1928 through 1941, and perhaps longer. Jersey Standard (old Exxon) was involved in many explicit cartel agreements with the Germans and many other corporate entities. Standard's main concern was that IG Farben and others would not compete with them in certain areas of the world, or in the development of particular technologies. We know this from documents that the Allies uncovered after WWII during the US occupation of Germany. Read the book, All Honorable Men, by James Stewart Martin, Little&Brown, 1950. Also books like: Cartels in Action; International Cartels; and the Kilgore Senate hearings in 1944-45 have a lot of data about collusion.

Still, since WWII, the 'true' picture of private corporate diplomacy for most, if not all, industries has yet to be written. Most historians are clueless.

IMO, during the last few decades, I think there has been much more competition than most would imagine. Though collusive agreements at the local/regional levels are more common than most assume, at the industrial level, I think there is little collusion. In truth, we probably will never know.

Modern corporate history is a void.

wp
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext