SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 237.17+6.1%11:16 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Phud who wrote (155743)4/12/2005 4:10:52 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Ephud:

The evidence goes like this, Q1/2004, the division with Intel flash has a large loss. In Q2/2004, the division with Intel flash has another large loss. In Q3/2004, the division with Intel flash has yet another large loss. In Q4/2004, flash is in a new division which again shows a large loss. Intel states in Q1/2005 that it will not show a flash profit until at least 2006. In about a week, Intel, by all the analysts, will show a loss in flash for Q1/2005.

Now Intel lost money in flash prior to Q1, it states that they are still losing money and will continue to lose money in flash. Ephud however continues to suggest that all losses were from other things than flash, yet the losses follow flash around at it moves between divisions. Conclusion, Ephud is wrong.

Pete

PS let's see If I have your views straight. Your view is like people have died before today, people died today and people will continue to die in the future, yet you suggest that people don't die because at least half of them are alive today. About as silly as your position wrt flash.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext