SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (228992)4/12/2005 7:57:42 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 1572911
 
>> Why sink $1B into a large refinery, when the odds are that increased capacity will depress revenue?

My long crusty memory of "Theory of the Firm" seems to recall something about operating at the point where MC = MR. If demand for oil has increased so dramatically over the years it would seem to me that SOME additional refining capability would be essential to maintaining optimal operations, since presumably, marginal revenue could be increased. And it is inconceivable to me that an additional billion dollar expenditure wouldn't be justified.

I think the real problem is somewhere else. As you've indicated, it takes many years to fully depreciate a refinery -- is there doubt about demand 25 or 30 years from now?

I don't purport to know that much about the subject. But I find it bizarre that refineries operating at full capacity aren't being augmented with more capacity given the demand for the product.

BTW, I'm not opposed to ANY government involvement with developing alterantive fuels. I just think it isn't very realistic or desirable to lay the overwhelming burden on government -- the free markets are going to have to provide the encouragement for people to adopt it or it will certainly fail.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext