Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (160547)	4/15/2005 5:08:49 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) of 281500

STILL using this guy as a credible witness. Credibility comes with being correct. In this case Ritter was correct. I don't care if he is a pedophile, though I highly doubt that...because no one credible has come forward with any facts on that...or on the $43,000. I have high doubts about both stories. But credibility is measured after the fact in this case...and Ritter had it right...therefore he's credible. Are you trying to say that since Ritter allegedly took $43,000 to make a movie...that there's got to be WMD's because he's not credible??? Ah...hello...the US weapons inspection team has been there for two years...following up on the work by UNSCOM...and both teams concluded that Saddam had no WMD. LOL...You're living in the past, still trying to black brush people...and still with no credible evidence yourself. What is it that motivates such hate? It's your credibility that is at stake here... Orca

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next