Some fact/logic fallacies:
"I see so many of you "crusaders" stating that there are no paid bashers and then asking rhetorically to name one." Me? I'm not a crusader. I'm a simple graphic designer. You asked for paid touts. I answered. There's a conflict with providing an answer to your question?
"Well, we saw one got convicted." Anthony? Sure, he got convicted of several charges of illegality. I expected he would. I thought he was a shady guy who pretended to wear a good guy's hat. But he didn't get convicted of "paid bashing". You're confusing facts with what you'd like to be reality. I'll defend Anthony on facts, not his conduct. You're being ... not factual. Much like we did this last week and the week before... etc...
"In fact, puggs is one of you guys, a basher." Obviously, you don't know the tout of RMIL, TVIS, AZNT etc... Pugs was no basher. You're attempting familiarity in the white zone, which you know nothing about.
The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in a red zone.
The red zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only. There is no stopping in a white zone.
No, the white zone is for loading. Now, there is no stopping in a RED zone.
The red zone has always been for loading.
Don't you tell me which zone is for loading, and which zone is for unloading.
Look Betty, don't start up with your white zone shit again.
Oh really, Vernon? Why pretend, we both know perfectly well what this is about. You want me to have an abortion. |