Investment Chat Board Lawsuits for Pros – moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits for Pros – moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: rrufff who wrote (77)	4/17/2005 11:11:13 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (3) of 120

I never followed Overstock and don't have an opinion on the stock or Byrne as a CEO. From the surface, it certainly looks like he accomplished a miracle and compared to most CEO's, should be beatified. Well, if you're at all interested in a view that scratches under the surface, you might want to look at these: jeffmatthewsisnotmakingthisup.blogspot.com jeffmatthewsisnotmakingthisup.blogspot.com (I omitted part three, which I thought was kind of a letdown.) The SEC has come out and asserted what we've been saying all along, that contrary to what the NCANS people have been screaming, inclusion of a stock on the SHO list is not direct evidence of abusive shorting in that stock. So now they say the SEC is part of the corruption, even though it's the SEC's list that they're citing as evidence in the first place. I mean, they literally want it both ways: the list is sacrosanct, but the people who issue it and try to explain exactly what it does and does not mean, are considered corrupt. That just doesn't work for me.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next