SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tonto who wrote (679939)4/18/2005 5:09:11 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
You still *crying*, tonto, about me daring to point out the obvious: that our tax codes are a morass of loopholes, special tax preference items, and favors for the politically well-connected?????????

HaHaHaHa!!!!!!!!

It's simply pointing out the obvious: an 82,000 page federal tax code is TOO DAMN LONG.

Can't imagine why you'd be so sensitive to the word "loophole" (unless you make your living at H&R Block, or as a tax shelter attorney, or else you just favor screwing the American people... :(

You are really going wild with your Orwellian 'political correctness'. So touchy, so sensitive about the morass of loopholes that we laughingly call our 'tax system', and anyone daring to say it's full of 'loopholes'!

As to something else that is EQUALLY OBVIOUS: if you think I 'post too much', you could always NOT POST TO ME (duh!)

... that tends to generate reply posts, don't 'cha know Tonto. :)

---------------------------------------------------------

Re: "Loopholes is a term that people who don't understand tax law use."

You don't *LIKE THE WORD*???????

(Ah, poor baby....) How about: "SPECIAL TAX PREFERENCE ITEMS"?

There. You feel BETTER NOW?

(You know... PRETENDING that our tax codes aren't ridden with LOOPHOLES doesn't make it any less true....)

Re: "We understand the laws and use them to our fullest legal advantage."

I never said that people were obligated to pay more then they are legally required to!

============================================
As the late US Appeals Court judge Learned Hand once wrote: "There is nothing sinister about arranging one's affairs so as to keep taxes as low as possible...nobody owes any duty to pay more than the law demands."

============================================
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext