SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (229798)4/18/2005 9:00:35 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1573848
 
In fact, your POV was greatly considered during Roe vs. Wade. That's why most abortions are limited to the first term.

Most abortions happen in the 1st trimester because 1 - If a woman doesn't want to be pregnant and is ok with abortion, she doesn't want to wait, and 2 - Abortions are cheaper and easier and safer (for the mother), earlier in the pregnancy. It has little to do with Roe vs. Wade.

In the 2nd trimester Roe allowed for regulation only in the interest of the mother, the fetus couldn't be considered. Even in the third trimester the allowable regulation has been very limited, certainly no outright ban of abortion in the third trimester has held up to judicial scrutiny. An exception for the health of the mother has always been required by the courts and that exception has been interpreted so broadly that a woman can say "I have to have this abortion or I'll go crazy" (mental health) at 8 months and no state law can stop her.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext