Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elroy who wrote (229955)	4/19/2005 1:17:04 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) of 1573899

Elroy, YOU were the one that used "what the mother said" to make some point, not me. I was just pointing out that your claim is inaccurate. Actually, you pretty much proved that my claim is indeed accurate. The rights of the unborn child changes based on what the mother wants. To an expectant mother, the unborn child is a baby, but to an "accidentally pregnant woman," the unborn child is a fetus. I know that's just fine with the majority of people like yourself, as long such ambiguity can be confined to the nine months between conception and birth. But to me, there isn't much of a difference between a baby in the womb and a baby outside of the womb. One look at an ultrasound is enough for me to decide that. Does that give me the right to "force my own morals upon others"? No, but I can't remember the last time I pointed a gun at a pregnant woman and forced her to give birth. (I won't speak for the idiots who blow up abortion clinics or kill abortion doctors.) As for merely "dictating my own morals," well, that's a 1st amemdment right, isn't it? Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next