Wow - I hadn't seen that post for some reason. I tend to ignore most of the personal background crap. That way, I don't have to waste time with more personal attacks and defer to the "trust me, we know all bashers and have done so much good, we're Batman personified" crap, but, if that's true, it shows how upset and hypocritical the suppposed defender of free speech can get.
I had read some posts from Louie, claiming that the censor was actually a tout for something called via vision, supposedly penny stocks, but, again, I tend to skip over all that stuff and try to stick to the arguments. (You might want to check them out if you haven't already.) I can't really differentiate between one sheep or another. For all I know, they admittedly party together, know each other, discuss their strategies together, but, of course, are not organized, do not collude, do not manipulate, do not scheme to manipulate. LOL. (Got a bridge to sell?)
But nothing would surprise me at this point given the vehemence with which they attack, one after another. I suppose it shouldn't surprise me. This was the tactic back in the days of rampant, raging gurus. Remember how the whole gang would follow posters around the boards, trashing picks, trying to intimidate and bragging about how they were successful 100% of the time on 100% of their picks? Of course, it was pretend real time picks and most of us would be right if our info was based on extortion or an FBI database. I've learned that nobody can be successful in picks more than about 70% of the time at least short term. Anyone who claims more than that is just a liar. That's why I use extreme diversification and DD in my own portfolio.
Thanks for posting that. I see one of the other sheep already bashed the author as a "whacko." SOP.
None of it really makes sense if someone wants to believe that they are basically honest, out to do gooders. Why would they even post on a thread titled "banned" particularly after they pretend to ignore the posters here? They have their "gated" threads as you call them, upon which they can glad hand and kissup, and say, "trust me."
Thank goodness for the work of the AUSA. Without that conviction, these characters would probably continue to run roughshod over people who post in response. |
