Ehud, "Where have I claimed or implied that? I've challenged those who claim Intel loses money [in flash business]"
Let me help you a bit here with logic, Elmer. I realize that
it might be too challenging for you, but I will try
anyway.
So, there were "those" who made a statement A =Intel is
loosing money in flash. In other words, they claimed A=TRUE.
According to your own statement above, you have
challenged them on many occasions. In the World
of Logic, there is only one interpretation of your activity,
that you implied that the statement A = FALSE. Equivalently,
it means that ^A = TRUE, (^ means <NOT>). Therefore, applying
<NOT> to the statement A, we have to invert "loosing"
to "making", which makes the statement to read:
"Intel is making money in flash" = ^A = TRUE.
This is what you essentially have said. QED.
:-)
- Ali
P.S. I am really surprised that for a man of your statue
as a "provider of engineering services" for Intel to test
their pentium chipsets (which must be pretty much based
on boolean logic, and finally PASS or FAIL), you have
so much difficulty to apply a single logical <NOT> operation
to a simple statement like "A" above. |
