Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (110801)	4/22/2005 11:45:08 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) of 793954

Depends on the procedure. Hormonal replacement or augmentation is ok. In vitro fertilization is not ok. Okay, so regulating hormones to permit conception is okay. Regulating the same hormones to prevent conception is not okay. What would you say to this understanding: Preventing conception is not okay, but the Church allows people to use periods of natural infertility as a kind of technical loophole. Same way husband and wife are not required to have sex if they don't want to. Sort of like an eruv in Jewish law. (you can look that one up -g-)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next