SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (160952)4/23/2005 2:18:51 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
wouldn't have any objections to Jews settling in Palestine, subject to Palestinian law

Ah, but the Palestinians would, which is why it will never happen. Not just for the relgious settlers, but also for the non-religious. What you just won't acknowledge is the very different nature of the regimes on either side of the border, and the contribution this has to the intractable nature of the conflict.

All these designations "stolen land" were invented post facto by the Arabs and picked up by their soulmates in the West. Stolen from whom? Jordan? Maybe Jordan shouldn't have attacked in 1967, did you think of that? BTW, when Jordan took the West Bank in 1948, every single Jew was driven out - from the Old City of Jerusalem and every other piece of land they owned. When Israel retook the West Bank in 1967, they returned the Jewish owned land to its owners. Was this "stolen land" too? if so, from whom?

You see, the question is far more complicated that the lefty propaganda you're reflecting lets on.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News