Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (111903)	4/30/2005 3:14:19 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (4) of 793917

"We believe that there were a number of distinct explosions in rapid succession, possibly as many as five," said U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board member John Bresland. Lead investigator Don Holmstrom said there may have been multiple ignition sources Houston, you have a problem. I was a demolition and explosives man for my first 5 years on "A" Teams. I attended every Army explosives school. The info above smells real, real, real bad...especially the second comment. I can visualize the possibility of accidental, successive and related explosions in a refinery. I cannot visualize the possibility of successive explosions with separate ignition sources being anything other than a deliberate attack. What I believe the investigator is saying is that the explosions were too far apart geographically to be related spontaneous detonations. That is huge and must be explained in detail. Initial Chemical analysis is likely complete...therefore the remarks. uw

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next