Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (112112)	5/1/2005 1:48:15 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) of 793917

At 60 mph a car covers nearly the length of a football field in 3 seconds. I think we're all aware of the particulars of the event. The context of my post was the reported complaints about how the LA Times declined to report the satellite evidence. What "made me wonder" was not the particulars of the event but why there were no original reports of the satellite evidence save the one I posted from Australia, yet multi reports of the alleged LA Times bias in not reporting it. It seems odd to complain that one source left out this alleged satellite evidence when it wasn't being reported elsewhere, either. Your response suggest that you perhaps thought I was "criticizing" the troops? <g>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next