Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (112120)	5/2/2005 12:09:56 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) of 793917

What "made me wonder" was not the particulars of the event but why there were no original reports of the satellite evidence save the one I posted from Australia, yet multi reports of the alleged LA Times bias in not reporting it. It seems odd to complain that one source left out this alleged satellite evidence when it wasn't being reported elsewhere, either. Huh? Nice try. Reuters has it. Al Jazeera has it. CBS has it. Even your favorite CNN has it. Though they reported 50 MPH. That report came out the day after the shooting. The satellite confirmed that the soldiers' speed estimate was conservative. FOX has it. Look around. It was reported elsewhere, even as the initial reports came out...and continues to be. Your response suggest that you perhaps thought I was "criticizing" the troops? <g> Gotta admit I don't see the humor. <FTG>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next