Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ): To the Insiders Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ): To the Insiders

LRCX 217.47

+4.2%

Jan 15 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: All Mtn Ski who wrote (5298)	5/2/2005 1:32:32 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) of 5867

Re: It would have been far more profitable to trade those peaks and valleys than to hold, even though AMAT beats them over that time period. You would have to make trading stocks a near full-time job....and that is assuming that you could do it correctly. Re: At the very least, you would have saved yourself a bunch of stress ....but would have added commissions, taxes, and the risk of being out of the market when it eventually rises. People who have traded AMAT over that course of time(30 years+) would most likely NOT outperform GE and WMT....outperformace over time while trading is difficult, if not near impossible, to do. Re: Granted those were insane times We are now at levels in terms of IC sales where we are comfortably ABOVE year 2000 levels. IC sales 2000= $205B IC sales 2004= $213B IC sales 2005(est)= $224B

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next