SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ron McKinnon who wrote (52939)5/4/2005 1:27:51 PM
From: Ron McKinnon  Read Replies (3) of 53068
 
The slow demise at General Motors reminds us yet again why the statement of cash flow is the superior analytical tool for defensive-minded investors than the income statement.
During the 19 years ending 2004, GM made money on an accrual (GAAP) basis every year except three years in the early '90s (source: Reuters). Total profits during these two decades: $33 billion.

But on a free cash flow basis, GM was the pits. It lost money in 1986, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1994, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004. Total red ink: $138 billion. For our purposes, free cash flow is operating cash flow minus investing cash flow.

Due to these cash losses, GM's book value (corporate net worth) is $4 billion less than in 1986. Ouch
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext