I have a lot of trouble with Griffin's agenda. The most glaring defect in his various rants is the obviously under researched nature of his accounts of the events of 9/11.
On the evidence of foreknowledge, he limits himself to two hearsay accounts, which are virtually impossible to independently document. This strikes me as rather disingenuous considering the laundry list of intelligence reports documented in the Mariani RICO suit, not to mention numerous other well documented accounts of specific individuals being forewarned of the impending attacks.
He talks of a military stand down, but neglects to mention, even in passing, the numerous diversionary exercises being conducted at the time of the attacks.
And, like many of the self appointed 9/11 gurus in whose footsteps he follows, he most carefully avoids any mention of the Israeli connections to the events of 9/11, or how that connection is tied into PNAC.
He begins his rant with a sermon on the religious implications of 9/11. Aside from the fact there is no religious tie in of any kind, mixing politics with religion is an instant turn off to a very large cross section of the population. Then in conclusion, he would substitute a globalization controlled by a fanatic group of the wealthy elite, for a globalization controlled by a fanatic group of shamans, who would thereby become a new incarnation of the wealthy elite.
IMO, Griffin should be tarred, feathered and ridden out of town on a rail. He's a nobody from nowheresville who is trying to capitalize on 9/11 by standing on the shoulders of those who were publishing research on 9/11 for 2 years before he decided there was an opportunity to make a quick buck on their efforts. |
