SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond Duray who wrote (16732)5/8/2005 2:23:05 PM
From: tsigprofit  Read Replies (3) of 20773
 
I urge everyone here to read this transcript of
Griffin's talk on CSPAN.

It has footnotes with factual details.

Thanks for posting Ray.

What category do you fall into on Griffin's scale, by the way?
1, 2, 3, or 4 (I would be interested in all reading this on the Moderate Forum to post where they are also numerically)

I'm guessing a strong 3 or 4 for you Ray, guess 1 is out ;=)

As I said, I was a 1 on 9-11, 2 as Bush was breaking international law with his pre-emptive strike on Iraq, and I've moved to 3 as the 9-11 report came out, with many people bringing up inconsistencies. I think at the least, the Bush administration is guilty of gross negligence and incompetence, but I would like to see the facts come out, and 4 being true would not surprise me at this point.

If 4 is proven, or even 3 partially, what will happen to Bush and team and the rest of the Republican Party in the next few years? Will they survive as a party if either 3 or 4 is proven to be true??
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext