"It has over 50 footnotes"
Uh huh. I noticed footnotes to all manner of polls, which can
only measure "OPINION" at best.
The footnotes are also loaded with references to newspaper
editorials, articles & books from left wing activists like
Noam Chomsky, Richard Falk, Jean Bethke Elshtain, David Ray
Griffin, Thierry Meyssan, Chalmers Johnson, David North, etc.
That doesn't instill confidence that these "footnotes" are
reliable sources of hard facts, let alone credible evidence.
Even worse, none of the footnotes include the exhaustive
investigations of the 9/11 Commission or the Senate
Intelligence Report, except to malign them (or cherry pick a
few minor points to the exclusion of the overall
conclusions).
The problem is that these thoroughly vetted reports both
concluded;
- Bush didn't lie or mislead
- No one from the Bush Admin pressured anyone to elicit desired responses
- No one from the Bush Admin had prior knowledge of 9/11 or used it for any "agenda"
And those investigations were bipartisan. |
