SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill5/11/2005 4:02:07 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 793917
 
"INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS: Still No Help For the Troops That Need It



May 10, 2005: Combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan are spotlighting, once again, the inability of the intelligence agencies to get all there expensive information to where it can do some good. With much fanfare, and in response to over a decade of public criticism, many intelligence organizations have made their data available via web sites. The Internet has provided the military with some great tools, and examples of how to get things done more efficiently. But putting intel data on web sites, available to those with the right need to know (and passwords), has not worked. The problem is that each of these organizations (one for different types of spy satellites, another bunch for each of the different types of aerial snoops, another for ground based eavesdropping and so on) seems to think they are the only game in town. They don’t make it easy for a user to get access, or even let the potential user know what they have so the potential user can decide to make the effort to get the stuff. To put it more bluntly, how does an infantry captain, ordered to conduct a raid on a suspected terrorist safe house, gather available intel on the target. Sure, the brigade or division intel people picked up something indicating the location was worth a raid. Maybe all they got was a tip from some guy living down the road. But the captain pulling off the raid would like some aerial pictures, a UAV overhead before and during the raid, data on phone or wireless traffic out of the location, and anything else that would help make the raid a success. The captain and his crew have not got a lot of time, or resources. Maybe they got a lap top with access to the classified military Internet, and the URLs and passwords for some intel sites. Unfortunately, most of these sites are not set up for fast turnaround, and the captain has only a few hours before he and his troops hit the road and do the raid. Now you can see why micro-UAVs are so popular. Captains with these little birds just forget about the $40 billion a year American intelligence apparatus, and fire up their $20,000 micro-UAV before they make the raid. Stare at the video feed (on a laptop screen) for a while, then give his troops their final orders and make the raid.

The intel brass have made a lot of noise about “responsiveness” and “fusion centers” to solve the captain’s problem. Unfortunately, nothing is happening at the captain level. Until the intelligence community can figure out how to provide timely and useful support for the people getting shot at, they are just wasting everyone’s time and money. Taking a handful of successes and using it to reassure the brass is not a solution to the grunts problem. He doesn’t want to be reassured, he wants to know what’s going on in and around the place where he’s going to be fighting tonight. That kind of support doesn’t seem to be there yet, and getting closer doesn’t really count with the troops."
strategypage.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext