Don't bother responding to my questions in this post until
you complete your response to each assertion you made in your
post comparing Bush to Hitler.
If you wish to post here, you will abide by thread rules.
It's not up to you to choose which unsubstantiated opinions
you will respond to or not. You will appropriately respond to
each one, replete with credible facts that can be
independently verified, or you will retract them & apologize
for your horrific slander of President Bush.
You can respond to the following after you prove to us that
your Bush/Hitler comparisons are factual & reality based.
...."You are an apologist for Bush"
Based on what facts? Again it seems you feel you are above
thread rules. Why is it that libs like you consistently have
this problem?
...."violate your own thread rules by personally attacking me"
Not true. Saying you disgust me because you compare Bush to
Hitler is NOT a personal attack.
Additionally, saying you are an unhinged liberal after your
repeated Bush/Hitler, "Fascist Amerika" remarks, replete with
a complete load of horseshit opinions asserted as fact to
support those remarks is not a personal attack.
Although you fervently believe what you said is true, your
remarks are those of someone who is completely unhinged from
reality. They are from someone who harbors so much hate they
can no longer tell fact from fiction. Even among your most
ardent liberal peers, you would be lucky to get a small
fraction of them to publicly support your lunatic rantings
comparing Bush to Hitler because most of them know too that
it is false & nothing more than a horrific smear.
And neither you nor those who might agree with you would be
able to provide credible, independently verifiable, reality
based facts to prove your assertions to be true because they
simply are not true.
In fact, you're lucky I didn't say what I really felt.
..."and posting your {wstera_02's} opinions only not based on facts"
So you opine. Can you point to a few incidents? I doubt it.
RE: Your response comparing Bush to Hitler, you were asked to
provide credible, independently verifiable facts to support
every one of your horrific assertions.
You have chosen to only respond to two. That is completely
unacceptable as noted above.
And your two responses were not even close to credible. In
fact they included assertions that are false, baseless &/or
that could not be independently verifiable, mostly because
they have no basis in fact or reality.
I will address those in separate posts. |
