SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tsigprofit who wrote (10262)5/12/2005 9:19:45 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 35834
 
This post will address your second pathetic attempt to
support one of the numerous examples of your vile spew of a
direct comparison between Bush & Hitler ("Fascist Amerika").

Your original assertion is as follows....

...."Bush created an entire neocon creed predicated on his War of Terror - rest of the world be damned, in violation of UN rules, and illegal American war on Iraq, with the myth of a Superior American race."

This is what you consider a factual, credible & independently
verifiable response to support that assertion.

...."Fact, I know you are familar with PNAC work in the 1990s, Cheney, Kristol, Wolfowitz, et. al. Do you dispute that covers of conservative magazines called for an invasion of Iraq in the late 1990s, long before 9-11?"

"Do you dispute that we attacked Iraq illegally according to Sec. Gen Kofi Annan of the UN?"

"Shall I look up these links for you also?"....


Again, you make all manner of personal opinions asserted as
fact, yet you provide ZERO independently verifiable credible
evidence to support them.

You asserted that PNAC was the, "entire neocon creed
predicated on his War of Terror"
. How so? You provided
nothing to remotely link anything from PNAC to Bush's plan to
fight the War on Terror.

And how would anything from PNAC or Bush's plan to fight the
War on Terror have any remotely legitimate link to compare
Bush to Hitler? We can't tell because you offered nothing to
begin any such comparison.

Hitler had a plan for world domination. Hitler had a plan to
exterminate all the Jews.

Did PNAC or Bush's plan to fight the war on Terror have any
such plan? You clearly imply it, but offer nothing to support
it except your personal opinion.

And this particular opinion includes the following, "rest
of the world be damned"
.

First, in a post 9/11 world, national security trumps world
opinion. And how does this allow you to make the grand leap
that Bush=Hitler?

Second, as I already stated in my previous reply to your
first bullshit assertion, "world opinion" had already been
bought by Saddam’s bribes with money he stole in the Oil-for-
Food scandal. Funny how you have a selective memory about
so-called "world opinion".

You further asserted this opinion as fact, "in violation
of UN rules"


How did you manage to conclude that our plan to fight the War
on Terror was in violation of UN Rules? I've never heard this
before. I'm completely unaware of any such assertion from the
UN either.

No, you weren't done with the baseless rhetoric. You added
this opinion, "and illegal American war on Iraq".

The decision by the US & the Coalition of the willing to
remove Saddam was NOT in violation of UN rules; I have also
debunked that myth in my last reply to you. Saddam was
horrifically in violation of the Gulf War Cease Fire
Agreement. UN Resolution #687 clearly spells it out.

Again, I'll note you provided ZERO evidence to support your
discredited opinion, but that is no different than any of
your factless, fantasy filled opinions asserted as fact.

At the end of your first sentence, you added this assertion
that "Bush", "predicated on his War of Terror" "with the
myth of a Superior American race
."


WHAT?!?!?? This is what you consider to be a genuine "fact"?
How in hell did you come to this obviously spurious opinion?

Again, we don't know since you continue to provide ZERO
evidence to support your ongoing routine of lies, distortions
& intentional misrepresentations stated as fact.

Somehow this is your idea of credible evidence to support
your second assertion that equates Bush with Hitler
& "Fascist Amerika". According to you the following is proof
of Bush using PNAC to devise his eeeeevil plan to fight the
War on Terror.

You press on with this obfuscation,

...."Do you dispute that covers of conservative magazines called for an invasion of Iraq in the late 1990s, long before 9-11?"

I wouldn't know. You seem to infer that I read these alleged
covers & you didn't specify a single one. Nevertheless,
political opinion from a magazine is no evidence of PNAC's
plan or Bush's plan to fight the War on Terror. And they have
ZERO relevance to your Bush=Hitler remarks.

Then you assert this,

...."Do you dispute that we attacked Iraq illegally according to Sec. Gen Kofi Annan of the UN?"

I absolutely dispute the bogus assertion that we "attacked
Iraq illegally". In fact I know it a completely false based
on the facts previously discussed.

I do agree that the beleaguered Kofi Annan who heads the
completely corrupt, totally inept UN made that baseless
remark. I will note that if indeed it had any merit, it would
have been more than an offhanded remark; it would have been
part of a widely reported investigation & subject of numerous
UN Resolutions, ET AL. As you know Anan's offhand utterance &
an official ruling from a genuine investigation are on the
opposite ends between personal opinion & genuine fact.

Again, I have no idea how any of this makes a case for your
Bush=Hitler, "Fascist Amerika" remarks. Even you failed to
make even the remotest of links.

...."Shall I look up these links for you also?"

LOL! I thought that's what you were going to do for each &
every one of your bullshit assertions. Instead you selected
two of your lamest retorts & proved beyond a shadow of a
doubt that you still cannot distinguish between;

- genuine fact & personal opinion,
- reality based & extremist rhetoric,
- credible evidence & lunatic fringe propaganda, &
- fact & fiction.

So how does any of the above discredited assertions of yours
allow you to make the grand leap to your Bush=Hitler "Fascist
Amerika" remarks? Again we have no idea since you completely
failed to make any connection whatsoever, factual or
otherwise.


I'd go on, but this should suffice for now.

As you can easily see, this one response of yours provides no
credible evidence. You have once again offered your personal,
unsubstantiated opinions asserted as fact. In reality they
are at best intentionally disingenuous. Almost every one of
your assertions cannot be independently verified because they
are false, misleading, distorted, have no relevance, or are
simply your own personal opinions.

If that is the best you can offer for this one small portion
of your Bush/Hitler, "Fascist Amerika" remarks, you need to
retract every one of your assertions & apologize for your
horrific slander of President Bush.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext