SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Kosan BioSciences -- KOSN

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: tuck5/14/2005 1:49:04 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 933
 
[17AAG + Gleevec didn't prevent regrowth of surviving CML cells]

>>Leukemia. 2005 May 12; [Epub ahead of print]

Lonafarnib reduces the resistance of primitive quiescent CML cells to imatinib mesylate in vitro.

Jorgensen HG, Allan EK, Graham SM, Godden JL, Richmond L, Elliott MA, Mountford JC, Eaves CJ, Holyoake TL.

1ATMU, Section of Experimental Haematology, Department of Medicine and Haematology, Division of Cancer Sciences & Molecular Pathology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Recent studies indicate that a rare population of primitive quiescent BCR-ABL(+) cells are innately insensitive to imatinib mesylate (IM) and persist after IM therapy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). New approaches to the eradication of these cells are therefore likely to be crucial to the development of curative therapies for CML. We have now found that Ara-C, LY294002 (a PI-3 (phosphatidylinositol-3' kinase) kinase inhibitor), 17AAG (a heat-shock protein (HSP)-90 antagonist) and lonafarnib (a farnesyltransfease inhibitor) all enhance the toxicity of IM on K562 cells and on the total CD34(+) leukemic cell population from chronic phase CML patients. However, for quiescent CD34(+) leukemic cells, this was achieved only by concomitant exposure of the cells to lonafarnib. Ara-C or LY294002 alone blocked the proliferation of these cells but did not kill them, and Ara-C, LY294002 or 17AAG in combination with IM enhanced the cytostatic effect of IM but did not prevent the subsequent regrowth of the surviving leukemic cells. These studies demonstrate the importance of in vitro testing of novel agents on the subset of primary leukemic cells most likely to determine long-term treatment outcomes in vivo.<<

Interesting, lonafarnib seems to have the upper hand here.

Cheers, Tuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext