Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gamesmistress who wrote (114566)	5/18/2005 2:29:58 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 794001

Dems want to have some advise and consent input by getting rid of the most ideological judges as they see it. Fillibuster was only weapon they had to use. If you reverse rolls and say barbara boxer was being nominated to the SCOTUS, do you think republicans wouldnt use filibuster and do you think that you would be on the side you are on now. It all depends on whose ox is being gored. Thats my only point here and i bet you in such a case you would be arguing for the filibuster. Hell the liberal dems, champions of the poor and downtrodden are using the hated filibuster that helped keep blacks in their second class citizen role for so long. mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next