SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation
WDC 187.68+8.9%Jan 2 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ausdauer who wrote (28232)5/18/2005 6:03:40 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) of 60323
 
I guess SanDisk could get dragged into this ugly affair, but I believe this could only occur
a) if SanDisk used trade secrets "stolen" by Toshiba in its flash products, b) the prior
agreement re: injunctions does not apply in this case, c) Lexar has previously undisclosed
basic flash patents that they have never previously contested, or d) SanDisk's prior SmartMedia
license is now considered insufficient on the basis of new information from the Toshiba litigation.


My understanding is that Lexar is going after Toshiba primarily for stealing trade secrets. By definition, the license that Sandisk has wouldnt apply in this case. I think Lexar has mentioned that they believe that Toshiba (and by extension, Sandisk) was able to come to market about 18 months more quickly than if they had developed the technology on their own.

I'm not sure how the Sandisk/Lexar agreement with regards to injunctions would apply in this case. I can imagine that Sandisk would sue Lexar for a stay of the injunction if there is absolutely any gray area in the agreement.

Slacker
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext