Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (162518)	5/19/2005 8:16:59 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Certainly the Daily Telegraph would have attempted to get off the hook by proving the documents as true, if it could, instead of just stating "It has never been the Telegraph's case to suggest that the allegations contained in these documents are true" But they did not. THE TELEGRAPH'S "DOCUMENTS" WERE THE FAMOUS FOREIGN MINISTRY'S DOCUMENTS and were (at least partially) forgeries: The Daily Telegraph has not published any investigation as to whether their documents were genuine, but a 2005 US senate report [10] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/11_05_05_psi_report.pdf) comments that the original article "apparently included forged documents" In other words, both the Christian Science "documents" and the Telegraphs's were forgeries. The questions remains, why would Gallaway's enemies feel the need to forge documents if there is real evidence against him? Oil Ministry's documents (supposedly discovered by some Iraqi newspaper) have never been presented to the authorities and did not even allege any wrong doing. It is worth noting that no respectable western media has seen them newsworthy (or authentic?). ST

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next