I am still wondering why you don't care to address questions regarding the veracity of information provided by the company.
If your sole intention is to engineer a short squeeze, it won't work IMHO if the company is not viable. That is the flaw in your reasoning.
There have been some legitimate questions asked, without any answers from you, who purport to know this company intimately. Why not enlighten us?
I suspect it's because, on that front, there are no answers which would remotely support the case you're trying to make for this stock.
Yes, fundamentals DO matter. The shorts can continue to sell naked into your scheme, just like they have been doing.
Hell, I'd do it too, if I could.
Please answer my question regarding the amount of time you are willing to give this effort. As I mentioned, by now the transfer agent should have been flooded with requests for certificates. There should not be, if you are correct, enough stock to satisfy the requests. Yet the stock price is moving in the opposite intended direction.
My prediction is that you will tell us all, after the fact, that you tried and failed (very altruistic of you) and walk away with a hefty profit at the expense of those you now seek to invest their hard earned money.
Everyone on this thread purports to be aware of the risks. I certainly hope they truly understand.
I do wish you the best of luck in your efforts, but it would be refreshing if you answered the questions put to you rather than simply reiterating the diatribe about short sellers.
It would do wonders for your credibility and your cause. |
